Pages

Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 January 2012

Word of the Week

Buttonbadge

(is what I'd proudly declare as a 5 year old)

Definition:  An accessory worn for either fashion or political reasons, adorned with images or words, generally affixed to clothing or bags via a pin on the back
Used in a sentence:  At TGI Fridays, they used to call buttonbadges that they wore as part of the unifore "pieces of flare".

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Fiddle faddle

So if you pay attention to the news at all- at least here in England- you know that there have been a spate of MPs who got in serious trouble for claiming things on their expenses that they shouldn't have.  It's been going on for quite a while, but there are still occasionally news stories about new developments.

These news stories tend to bring out my husband's crazies.  I've told you about a few of mine, but don't worry, Ross and I are a well-matched couple.  He's got his own crazies!

Every time a story related to these scandals comes on the radio, they very proper, well spoken, BBC news casters say a phrase that sets Ross' crazies into overdrive.  They'll say that an MP was accused/found guilty of/sentenced for "fiddling their expenses".


This makes Ross' shoulders go up and his hackles go up.  He gets all ranty (and cute) and yells at the radio.  It drives him crazy that, in a serious news story, they use such casual slang.  He has a point that these MPs are not charged with "fiddling" anything.  As best as I can tell, they are charged with "false accounting".  Ross claims it's just a matter of time before the reporters are saying things like:

"He got done for fiddling and is now banged up."
"The bitch is in the chokey for fiddling."

I have to say, though it doesn't provoke my crazies like it does his, that he's right.  It makes me wonder why the hallowed BBC continues to use such slangy and ugly (and for that matter inaccurate) words in their reporting.

What do you think?  
Would that bother you, or is my husband just special?
Is there anything you hear in the media, that gets your crazies?

Thursday, 11 August 2011

Weee-Oooo Weee-Oooo

Today's post isn't directly about the riots.
You may have noticed that I haven't addressed them on this blog.
Lots of other people are talking about them and, in real life, I'm certainly talking and thinking about them.  I'll just say the following.

Are the riots disgusting and sad?  Yes
Is it senseless violence?  Yes
Are there sociological reasons that are at the root of all this?  Yes

So back to the real point of the post.
The riots have helped point out yet another difference between my country of origin and my adopted home.  On Tuesday night, the buzz was that violence was expected to spread to Manchester.  Ross and I judiciously avoided city centre (British for downtown) from early afternoon.  We tucked up safely at home and then posted to Facebook to let people know we were safe.  Then we called my grandparents (who don't have the internet) to reassure them that we were out of harm's way.

As we sat on the couch were heard a long wail from what must have been several sirens.  The sound cut through the air.  Ross tensed and said, "That sounds really bad."  I agreed.

But it got me thinking.  That amount of siren noise would barely have been worth noting in Dallas.  I'm certainly not saying that Dallas is crime-ridden.  To the contrary, I felt very safe living there.  But there must be some cultural difference in use of sirens.  I'm pretty sure I can count on both hands the number of times I've heard sirens since moving to Manchester.  I've lived here a year and a half.  I'm pretty sure I heard sirens on at least a weekly basis in Dallas.

I don't know if it's because there aren't freeways running through the city here, or because they use cameras to catch most traffic violations (like speeding and running lights), or some other reason.  It's sort of nice.  The siren sound means so much more when it's more rare.  It makes life seem safer during the times when you don't hear it.

Wouldn't it be nice if we never had to hear sirens at all?

Those are my thoughts, and now here are some pictures.
On Wednesday, we went into town to run errands and saw some of the aftermath.  It didn't look too terrible. We saw boarded up windows, like this high end jean shop (Diesel).  Every single window had been smashed.


We also saw this little pastry shop, which was open for business despite it's boarded windows.


Thankfully, Manchester didn't experience much trouble on the next night.  Mostly due to this:

The street where our warehouse is.

It was a very rainy and unseasonably cold day- one of the best crime deterrents there is.  When we went into town today we did see a few more boarded windows, but we weren't sure if they were new damage or not.

Stay safe.

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

That Would Never Happen in America...

The British political system is pretty fascinating.
It's been a pretty interesting year with a coalition of the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrat party in control of the country.

But today I'm going to talk about something that has received a little coverage here, but made me think about some of the social standards that differ between England and the US.  I'm going to talk about this man:


Ed Miliband is the leader of the Labour Party.  He was elected to the position after Gordon Brown's departure.  I don't actually know that much about Ed's politics.  I do know that his voice sounds a bit like a petulant teenager when he gets passionate.  

But that's not what I want to talk about.  Ed Miliband would never have been elected to such an important position in America.  Now this isn't because of his political views or his education or ability to perform in his job.  It's because of his personal life.  Ed has two young sons.  Ed is in a relationship with their mother and has been since they met in 2004.  Ed is not married to her.  *Cue the shock and horror!*  

Ed is in the fairly commonplace situation of having a "partner".  Now in America, partner is really only used for gay couples.  In England it is not uncommon for couples to be in committed long-term relationships, often with children, but not to be married.  In America it's pretty much reserved for Goldie Hawn & Kurt Russell, Susan Sarandon & Tim Robbins (how did I miss that they broke up!?!) and Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie.

I just can't imagine America going for a political leader who's home life looked like Ed's... Which got me thinking.  What does it really matter?  Does the fact that he isn't married impact how he's going to run the country?  I don't know.  I do know that it does bother me.  Perhaps this makes me old-fashioned.  (Not really a term I would often apply to myself- though I guess in some ways it fits.)  I know for a fact that the aforementioned celebrity relationships bug the crap out of my mom.  Maybe it's rubbed off on me :)

Ed explains why he hasn't married his partner yet:  politics have "gotten in the way" and more recently he's "not ready yet".  Hmmm.  Yeah- it officially bothers me.

Am I alone on this?  Can anybody give me an explanation for this "partner" phenomenon's prevalence (alliteration, baby!) in England?